Tuesday, October 2, 2018

SHROUD OF TURIN



SHROUD OF TURIN

AUTHENTIC

The Saturday, October 3, 1981, Salisbury Daily Times published this
writing by George W. Cornell, an AP Religion Writer. I remember
the subject being rather controversial at the time, but, never remembered
the outcome. Here is the story.

There was a “Shroud of Turin” research project and many consultants.
50 or more, known as STRUP, that performed experiment and analyses,
and issued a final report in 1981.

This report concluded the ancient 14 x 4 linen cloth did in fact wrap the body of the crucified Jesus and holds evidence of the Resurrection.

Kenneth Stevenson , spokesman for STRUP, and , Gary Haberman,
consultant , write;

' The evidence is not pure proof, however, is the best explanation
of the results of the physical, chemical, medical, and historical facts
at hand. Technical findings are presented in the book “ Verdict on the
Shroud” The evidence was approached in a skeptical posture and
judgments of probability that favor the authenticity of shroud as
evidence for Jesus' death and resurrection.
The probability of odds are 83 to 1 that it was Jesus buried in the
shroud . Facts indicate the body was not removed from the cloth by
humans, but by a scorch of heat from “extraordinary occurrence”
not explained by natural means.


Abstract: 10/01/18 by Harrison H, from the Saturday, October 3,
1981, Salisbury Daily Times for;

No comments:

Post a Comment